The reviews are automatic translation.
For maintenance work
On 2017-10-16 15:43:08
It was thin. It was about 198 yen at home center. It will be helpful if we can compare thickness of gloves. I could not tell from photo.
Plastering construction work
On 2017-09-10 19:42:10
I am indebted with purchasing every time. Considering this price, it is a product that I am satisfied with satisfactorily, but I'm happy that there is only a little more thickness, if anything.
On 2017-06-17 15:59:04
For caring for garden trees on the premises of my home, for car and motorcycle maintenance, it is a solid material. I use it especially in winter.
On 2017-04-28 19:15:38
Last time I bought cheaper than this item, but it was suitable for the price so I bought this one.
On 2017-04-11 12:51:30
Unfortunately it seems that there is no thickness even though g gauge and gauge are the same.
On 2017-04-05 14:44:53
I knew that it would be a little late to order, but the situation has not been delivered due to re-extension.
On 2017-02-04 08:30:25
Compared to price, the quality is reasonable, there is no dissatisfaction. Since disposable is almost the same, this level is sufficient.
On 2017-01-20 12:55:15
It is cheaper than last year. The price was cheap so far, the thickness was more than the discount shop, I bought it many times, but it has become thin from this year, the space between the fingers and the fingers breaks at once, can not be used at all. I bought 4 sets, but I am worrying what to do. It is very disappointing.
As a working glove
On 2017-01-06 10:00:04
It's quite thick, so you can use it with confidence. Usability is also good.
On 2016-12-27 09:11:29
At first, I was worried because it was thinner than 600 g of the workmen I used so far, but it was easier to use if I got used to it.