The reviews are automatic translation.
Time of delivery
On 2016-05-30 09:14:29
Usability than those of home improvement well, because you can choose as size, have survived.
Storage of documents
On 2015-10-11 16:22:46
The cardboard seems to be strength is insufficient.
On 2015-06-30 14:47:20
Since this size is not much, also I will be happy to buy, but I want you to strongly a little more strength. It is regrettable that there is a thing that would collapse during delivery.
On 2015-03-17 14:41:16
Thing is very satisfied can delivery without break even put some many without the size and thickness, and the like problem
Items I'd like to purchase price is followed if fallen below
On 2014-05-06 08:14:53
Product was common, but you troubled very slow delivery of the delivery company. Shipping is very unpleasant have stopped at the delivery company at the earliest.
It uses, such as the dispatch packing of goods
On 2013-04-12 14:54:31
Or paper quality is bad, the surface layer of the paper is very weak.
I do not know at the time of the order so also in the catalog the surface layer of the paper quality is not written.
Also what the surface close to the size of the K5 is, so not sold, the future product expansion
And we'd appreciate it if you could expand.
Clothing of stock
On 2013-02-21 11:48:29
Strength was also just good to moderate in the intended use.
For long-term storage of documents (file)
On 2012-04-03 12:17:20
Currently sold in that tube file (8cm × 3 books + 6cm × 1 books) enters into a box, there is no impossible for the weight also carry alone weight. Size is just good. However, since there is a little thin thickness of cardboard, if the number of times the move is large, it may be better a little more thick.