The reviews are automatic translation.
On 2017-04-20 23:21:27
On 2017-04-17 16:42:00
Use the office of the post
On 2017-01-17 18:46:54
Amount of money even cheaper had I but thinner than stainless steel thickness is thought
Come distorted and hit strongly was a drawback.
Put newspapers and mail,
On 2016-10-26 15:08:50
Greater than I thought made also was able to buy that may have been firm.
Installed in the factory
On 2016-08-04 21:20:23
Simple, it was good. Just be inconspicuous? I think.
For the home
On 2016-01-24 19:20:16
A4 size is just good, but cylindrical, such as the calendar is impossible.
Attached to the existing housing
On 2015-12-17 07:07:46
More thickness is thin and wanted to see the actual thing
Although strength is worrisome
It is convinced at this price
On 2015-01-16 16:34:24
We used to your house of audience
In stainless steel products, because it is cheaper, in the audience, willing, we can
Replacement of the mailbox damage
On 2014-08-20 00:36:50
I feel like the material thickness of the body itself is thin was, but it is not used on the problem. And it was from the amount is enough.
As mailbox of the office
On 2014-08-13 10:31:28
I think that strength is good a little more there. Later Sten thickness of 1 millimeter increase and I think that sense of stability has come out, but ...
From price surface, it is satisfied with the prototype.