The reviews are automatic translation.
On 2017-01-17 18:00:16
Not suitable for the operation of the easy to wear, but a long period of time of the car for the price
Because What a for Mabaiku there is minus be satisfied
Commuting + outdoor light work
On 2016-01-18 10:37:33
As there is also the other do other post, now it contains a crack to penetrate the water to quickly and fairly.
The comfort is not so bad, but it seems unfortunate can be as footwear.
Machining in general · Welding etc.
On 2015-03-31 13:29:19
From the beginning of wearing, a crack occurred on the third day. I have used it, so I am still using it, but from the design and comfort, this crack is very disappointing. If somehow improvement can be asked, there may be purchase again · · ·
Farm work at home
On 2015-02-02 21:51:29
I purchased this safety shoe for the first time. It is very difficult to paint. I am troubled because my instep is so tall. If you wear lightly comfortable to wear is very good. Since the law of safety shoes with chuck is easy to wear, I will never buy again.
Construction site work
On 2014-12-02 13:20:56
It is very comfortable and comfortable safety shoes. It is lighter and easier to use than I thought.
As a substitute for rider boots.
On 2014-08-25 19:00:38
Apart from rainy weather, I felt like this is a monetary amount, but when I got on a motorcycle in the rainy weather, the rainwater soaked my legs into a wet condition. It can not be used when going out.
Used at work site
On 2014-04-18 23:23:13
Although I bought it, the water enters the inside on the first day I wore it. And after wearing a few times, the inside of the center of the right foot got broken. It is unknown whether it was thinned to soften but it was slightly something (hard thing) pushed? I think whether it is safe shoes that it can be torn at. It is also water intake. It was the most durable in the safety shoes that I bought. I think that there is no problem if it is used indoors, but it is better if you stop using it on the spot. It is better to buy the size 0.5 cm smaller. It is exactly 25.5 cm if 26 cm. (It may be difficult to wear a thick ankle person) I will not buy it twice, but for your information
On 2014-04-18 13:14:07
The width is slightly tight.
Substitution for motorcycle boots
On 2014-02-14 21:54:21
I bought it for the purpose of riding a bike. Design and comfort are not bad. Material seems cheesy but I think that compromising enough if we consider the price. The size is a bit bigger, but since we wear thick socks there is no problem. Because it is synthetic leather, it seems that waterproofness is also good. I think that it is good to raise the protection strength by thickening the fabric material a little more. Also, I think that perfect if you extend the length a little more.
Motorcycle commuters to heavy goods transport machinery maintenance
On 2013-02-14 01:55:16
I think that it is a good shoe because it is resistant to weather and rain and it is hard to steam. But fatal is size notation and actual size difference. I liked 25.0 cm safety shoes from the same manufacturer, so I bought this product (25.5 cm), but it is unrelentingly shabby as 25.5 cm, even if I put in the insoles it may seem to be off . Where two of my colleagues with legs 26.5 ~ 27 wore, they said that they were exactly right. I would like to repurchase 24.5 cm, but I was hesitant because it is too troublesome to return → I was small when I wear it. To be honest, I was most disappointed with my shopping with Monotaro. Please take action in some way.