The reviews are automatic translation.
As reported the paper.
On 2017-03-24 23:08:20
Waist was purchased to seek a firm texture strongly. We are satisfied he wanted the paper.
On 2016-08-25 22:34:18
Usability good, is also satisfied with the price basis.
Construction photo book creation, etc.
On 2016-08-10 16:31:21
Is good. To arrive early, such as paper thickness and specifications on the net
Since the look slowly thankful
Order of exercises Create a conference
On 2016-05-13 18:20:22
Also because it was clear even if you firmly printing paper
It was usable without problem.
On 2016-03-24 15:47:26
Since this size, inkjet paper of this specification, it is less in the over-the-counter, can I buy good at this price.
It survived because arrived earlier than the scheduled date.
Events of the program
On 2015-12-26 21:18:21
Coloring has pleased very well. In addition, it was satisfactory as the paper of the program that you are use.
Club of the journal (double-sided color printing)
On 2015-12-17 17:10:47
Since the amount is required, preferable if there is 100 sheets / bag or 50 sheets / bag.
For photo submission
On 2015-04-13 09:36:56
Less bleeding to the back at the time of double-sided printing, just the right thickness also is beautiful print!
For the leaflet of the product
On 2015-03-31 09:04:53
To the paper thickness is also just good, color is also a favorite.
Since the B5 size is too much is not handled by the other, it is welcome
Expensive of a drawback than mono A4 only. I may, if there is 100 pieces, but ...
Simple brochure (with image)
On 2014-11-12 17:17:48
Since the regularly required paper, bought by utilizing the time of discount.
(By using the discount) Nearby retailers cheaper than you can buy in the line up to a certain mail order site "lowest price".
Two-sided printing 100 sheets is (as far as I know) this only without, COSPA is MAX.